| Peer-Reviewed

Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide

Received: 4 February 2023    Accepted: 24 February 2023    Published: 11 April 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The role of fuel in global economy cannot be overemphasized, it is necessary to develop new and more efficient technologies in desulphurization processes at a low cost. This research focuses on optimization of desulphurization using oxidative method for higher yields, utilizing dual acetic/formic acid catalyst on residual oil with sulphur concentration > 0.50%wt and emphasizes the improvement of physicochemical properties primarily suitable for use in fuels where regulation is becoming more stringent. The process was conducted using H2O2 oxidant concentration 12.5-25.0% (w/w), CH3COOH/HCOOH acid catalyst mixture 12.5-22.0% (w/w), and reaction temperature 40-60°C. Optimization of the desulphurization parameters was done using response surface methodology based on Box-Behnken design. The optimum yield of desulphurization (60.93%) was achieved at the oxidant 18.75% (w/w), acetic/formic mixture of 17.25% (w/w), and reaction temperature of 50°C. In general, the experimentally confirmatory figures in two solutions of 63.29 ± 0.47% and 61.04 ± 0.13% match the predicted values of 62.82% and 60.91%, respectively. The total sulphur content in residual oil was reduced from 0.67 to 0.26%wt. GC-MS of the untreated sample confirm the presence of 1,2-benzisothiazole,3-(hexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl)-1,1-dioxide, Nickel(II)bis(N,N-dihexyldithiocarbamate and Diethyl[3-[n-octadecylmercapto]-P-n-butyl-anilino methy lene] malonate with a total percentage peak area of 11.83%. In the treated sample shows no sulphur compounds. The physicochemical analysis for both treated and untreated residual oil according to ASTM were found to be within acceptable limit except sulphur content of untreated sample. After the desulphurization, treated residual oil shows a remarkable improvement in the physicochemical parameters. Hence can be applicable in industrial process and automobiles with very low sulphur emission.

Published in Petroleum Science and Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12
Page(s) 7-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Optimization, Oxidative, Desulphurization, Residual Oil

References
[1] Houda, S.; Lanclot, C.; Blanchard, P.; Poinel, L.; and Lamonier, C. (2018). Oxidative Desulphurization of Heavy Oils with High Sulphur Content: A Review Catalyst doi: 10.11648/j.ajac.20180601.13.
[2] Abdullahi, D. M.; Abubakar G. I.; Musa U.; Shehu A.; and Yababa, N. A. (2012). Comparative Study on Sulphur reduction from Heavy Petroleum-solvent Extraction and Microwave Irradiation Approach. 3 (6): 949-960.
[3] IMO (2018). The 2020 Global Sulphur Limit. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Documents/2020%20sulphur%20limit%20FAQ%202019.pdf.
[4] Srivastava, V. C. (2012). An Evaluation of Desulphurization Technologies for Sulphur removal from Liquid Fuels, Royal Society of Chemistry Advances. 2: 759–783.
[5] Chan, N.; Fan, W.; and Yen, T. (2009). The desulphurization Process of Heavy Fuel Oil. American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry 54 (1): 70-71.
[6] Shang, H.; Du, W.; Liu, Z.; and Zhang, H. (2013). Development of Microwave induced Hydrodesulphurization of Petroleum Streams. A review. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Chemistry. 19: 1061–1068.
[7] Haruna, S. Y.; Faruq, U. Z.; and Liman, M. G. (2018a). Reduction of Sulphur Content of Heavy Crude Oil using Oxidative Desulphurization. ISSBN-10: 6139577586.
[8] Haruna, S. Y.; Faruq, U. Z.; Zubairu, A. Y.; Liman, M. G.; and Riskuwa, M. L. (2018b). Comparative Studies on Reduction of Sulphur Content of Heavy Crude Oil Using KMnO4+H2O2/CH3COOH and KMnO4+H2O2/HCOOH Via Oxidative Desulphurization (ODS). American Journal of Applied Chemistry. 6 (1): 15-24.
[9] Tetrisyanda, R.; Wiguno, A.; Ginting, R. R.; Dzikrillah, C. Z.; and Wibawa, G. (2018). Residue Oil Desulphurization Using Oxidation and Extraction Method. Indonesia. Journal of Chemistry. 18: 242 – 249.
[10] Muhammad, A. B., Obianke, M., Hassan, L. G., and Aliero, A. A., (2016). Optimization of process variables in acid catalysed insitu transesterification of Hevea brasiliensis (rubber tree) seed oil into biodiesel, Biofuels, https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1242689.
[11] Dana, M.; Sobati, M. A.; Shahhossieni, S.; and Kalishami, A. R. (2019). Separation of Sulphur-Containing Compounds from. Diesel by Oxidation Followed by Solvent Extraction in a Single Drop Column. Brazilian journal of Energy Engineering. 36: 1343 – 1355.
[12] Fa-Tang, L.; Cheng-Guang, K.; Zhi-Min, S.; Ying-Juan, H.; Rui-Hong, L.; and Di-Shun, Z. (2012). Deep Extractive and Oxidative Desulphurization of Dibenzothiophene with C5H9NO.SnCl2 Coordinated ionic Liquid, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 205-206: 164-170.
[13] Habib, B.; Dabai, M. U.; and Faruk, U. Z. (2019). Comparative study on GC-MS Charaterization of atmospheric and vacuum oil residue from KRPC, Kaduna, Nigeria. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Sciences. 2664-6765.
[14] Ahmadian, M.; Anbia, M.; and Rezaie, M. (2020) Sulphur Dioxide Removal from Flue Gas by Supported CuO Nanoparticle Adsorbents. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research, 59 (50), 21642−21653.
[15] Kazakov, A. A.; Tarakanov, G. V.; and Ionov, N. G. (2016). Mechanisms of oxidative desulphurization of straight-run residual fuel oil using ozonized air. Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils, 52: 1 DOI 10.1007/s10553-016-0669-2.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sadiq Tijjani Ahmed, Chika Muhammad, Aminu Bayawa Muhammad, Ibrahim Muhammad Danmallam, Sirajo Abubakar Zauro, et al. (2023). Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide. Petroleum Science and Engineering, 7(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sadiq Tijjani Ahmed; Chika Muhammad; Aminu Bayawa Muhammad; Ibrahim Muhammad Danmallam; Sirajo Abubakar Zauro, et al. Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2023, 7(1), 7-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sadiq Tijjani Ahmed, Chika Muhammad, Aminu Bayawa Muhammad, Ibrahim Muhammad Danmallam, Sirajo Abubakar Zauro, et al. Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide. Pet Sci Eng. 2023;7(1):7-13. doi: 10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12,
      author = {Sadiq Tijjani Ahmed and Chika Muhammad and Aminu Bayawa Muhammad and Ibrahim Muhammad Danmallam and Sirajo Abubakar Zauro and Bilyaminu Ahmad Rafi},
      title = {Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide},
      journal = {Petroleum Science and Engineering},
      volume = {7},
      number = {1},
      pages = {7-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pse.20230701.12},
      abstract = {The role of fuel in global economy cannot be overemphasized, it is necessary to develop new and more efficient technologies in desulphurization processes at a low cost. This research focuses on optimization of desulphurization using oxidative method for higher yields, utilizing dual acetic/formic acid catalyst on residual oil with sulphur concentration > 0.50%wt and emphasizes the improvement of physicochemical properties primarily suitable for use in fuels where regulation is becoming more stringent. The process was conducted using H2O2 oxidant concentration 12.5-25.0% (w/w), CH3COOH/HCOOH acid catalyst mixture 12.5-22.0% (w/w), and reaction temperature 40-60°C. Optimization of the desulphurization parameters was done using response surface methodology based on Box-Behnken design. The optimum yield of desulphurization (60.93%) was achieved at the oxidant 18.75% (w/w), acetic/formic mixture of 17.25% (w/w), and reaction temperature of 50°C. In general, the experimentally confirmatory figures in two solutions of 63.29 ± 0.47% and 61.04 ± 0.13% match the predicted values of 62.82% and 60.91%, respectively. The total sulphur content in residual oil was reduced from 0.67 to 0.26%wt. GC-MS of the untreated sample confirm the presence of 1,2-benzisothiazole,3-(hexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl)-1,1-dioxide, Nickel(II)bis(N,N-dihexyldithiocarbamate and Diethyl[3-[n-octadecylmercapto]-P-n-butyl-anilino methy lene] malonate with a total percentage peak area of 11.83%. In the treated sample shows no sulphur compounds. The physicochemical analysis for both treated and untreated residual oil according to ASTM were found to be within acceptable limit except sulphur content of untreated sample. After the desulphurization, treated residual oil shows a remarkable improvement in the physicochemical parameters. Hence can be applicable in industrial process and automobiles with very low sulphur emission.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Optimization of the Oxidative Desulphurization of Residual Oil Using Hydrogen Peroxide
    AU  - Sadiq Tijjani Ahmed
    AU  - Chika Muhammad
    AU  - Aminu Bayawa Muhammad
    AU  - Ibrahim Muhammad Danmallam
    AU  - Sirajo Abubakar Zauro
    AU  - Bilyaminu Ahmad Rafi
    Y1  - 2023/04/11
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12
    T2  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    JF  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    JO  - Petroleum Science and Engineering
    SP  - 7
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-4516
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pse.20230701.12
    AB  - The role of fuel in global economy cannot be overemphasized, it is necessary to develop new and more efficient technologies in desulphurization processes at a low cost. This research focuses on optimization of desulphurization using oxidative method for higher yields, utilizing dual acetic/formic acid catalyst on residual oil with sulphur concentration > 0.50%wt and emphasizes the improvement of physicochemical properties primarily suitable for use in fuels where regulation is becoming more stringent. The process was conducted using H2O2 oxidant concentration 12.5-25.0% (w/w), CH3COOH/HCOOH acid catalyst mixture 12.5-22.0% (w/w), and reaction temperature 40-60°C. Optimization of the desulphurization parameters was done using response surface methodology based on Box-Behnken design. The optimum yield of desulphurization (60.93%) was achieved at the oxidant 18.75% (w/w), acetic/formic mixture of 17.25% (w/w), and reaction temperature of 50°C. In general, the experimentally confirmatory figures in two solutions of 63.29 ± 0.47% and 61.04 ± 0.13% match the predicted values of 62.82% and 60.91%, respectively. The total sulphur content in residual oil was reduced from 0.67 to 0.26%wt. GC-MS of the untreated sample confirm the presence of 1,2-benzisothiazole,3-(hexahydro-1H-azepin-1-yl)-1,1-dioxide, Nickel(II)bis(N,N-dihexyldithiocarbamate and Diethyl[3-[n-octadecylmercapto]-P-n-butyl-anilino methy lene] malonate with a total percentage peak area of 11.83%. In the treated sample shows no sulphur compounds. The physicochemical analysis for both treated and untreated residual oil according to ASTM were found to be within acceptable limit except sulphur content of untreated sample. After the desulphurization, treated residual oil shows a remarkable improvement in the physicochemical parameters. Hence can be applicable in industrial process and automobiles with very low sulphur emission.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Energy and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Energy and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Energy and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Sokoto Energy Research Centre, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Energy and Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Life Sciences, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria

  • Department of Chemistry, Nigerian Army University, Biu, Nigeria

  • Sections